Until someone does it on here to their Eclipse Cross, brings it to the dyno, and we see some power gains (and afrs and boost levels).I'm going to wait. I'd do it on mine but that warranty is pretty cool right now. Mitsubishi MU-2 King Air Duke Baron Twin Cessna Cheyenne Navajo Aerosiar Seneca. But I'd like to see the AFRs and Boost and dyno numbers before really believing in this 'modification' for the Eclipse Cross, not for other cars. To date, BRS has sold more than 17,000 systems and saved 156. I have not seen actual dyno numbers to really believe the TDI claims on the power increase. If anything, I'd assume that this chip doesn't know what it to do at 100% immediate WOT which freaks out the ECU. From TDI, they're claiming the chip "remaps vehicle performance moment to moment based on data received via the engine sensor interface harness".Since the Eclipse Cross has a drive by wire throttle, I'd assume the ECU sees immediate 100% throttle, then it goes "holy crap, that's a hole lot of boost, what the hell is going on?!" and cuts to limp mode before the driver makes any more excessive damage. I'm just making an assumption here.but (immediately at 100% WOT) since the "chip" is just "readjusting" boost levels, the ECU is 'sensing' this increase of air and goes into "limp mode" (flashing dash lights). The Power FC is a complete, stand alone, total engine management system capable of handling virtually anything thrown in its path. That probably means the "chip" is not doing what it's suppose to do at certain throttles.? Model Number: View Price ApexI Power FC Mitsubishi Eclipse GST & GSX 97-99The Power FC proudly stands as APEXis answer to the constraints and limitations associated with most piggy-back style fuel controllers. That's concerning that the car decides to throw codes at WOT. But a "chip" solution? Hmmm.Įither way, good luck - let us know how it goes. I posted something somewhere about a throttle response controller - there's something that might be worthy of a look. With ECMlink, however, thats a realistic scenario. Novices dont typically pick up an AEM EMS or an EVO 8 ECU and start tuning the next day. 99.99 of the time ECMlink should be the answer. I highly doubt neither the engine internals nor CVT are up to the task of even a mild uptick in performance. For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. Doesn't matter what vehicle or what year you're in - some things will never change.Įven if your vehicle is turbocharged, you always want to ask yourself - "is this really getting me the power I want"? Especially considering the risk. True performance numbers don't come from a chip. In the end, so-called 200hp performance ratings will only really get you to about 120hp/150lb-ft at the wheels on AWD, after all the mechanical drag introduced by the drivetrain. Also remember that, no matter what ratings an engine puts out on the crank, there's always drivetrain lossy to consider to the wheels - this is what these simulated dynos don't show you. So, using this as a benchmark, I wouldn't expect much. If anything, at best it's probably crank readings, or simulated through one of those "on-board" dyno apps.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |